ALARM BELLS: The WHO Pandemic Agreement Is Here – And It’s Worse Than You Think
ALARM BELLS: The WHO Pandemic Agreement Is Here – And It’s Worse Than You ThinkThe World Health Organization’s new Pandemic Agreement was ‘adopted’ at the 78th World Health Assembly in May 2025.
The consequences for Australia—and the world—will be staggering.
But good news: it’s not ready to be signed because it’s not completed!
Confusing huh: how can it be adopted if it is not completed? Well this is what happens when unelected organisations make it up: and our representatives (Penny Wong) don’t hold them to account!
Why Should You Care?
The Self-Fulfilling Loop of Control
Under this agreement, the WHO an unelected global organisation, would:
- Receive the pathogen
- Declare the pandemic
- Recommend the response/solution
- Australia complies
This is not health sovereignty. It’s international supervision.
What Is It?
The Pandemic Agreement is a new treaty claiming to “promote equity” in preventing and managing pandemics. But the fine print reveals:
- A centralised global authority (WHO + Conference of the Parties – Article 21)
- Surveillance and testing obligations across people, animals, and ecosystems (Article 4 & 5 – “One Health”)
- Supply chain control and “equitable distribution” of vaccines and medicines via a WHO-led global network(Article 13)
- Mandatory data sharing of pathogens, health data, trial results, and even intellectual property (Articles 9, 11, 12)
- A powerful Conference of the Parties (COP) to review compliance and make binding recommendations
What It Means for Australia
- WHO becomes the “directing and coordinating authority” (Preamble & Article 1)
- Australia must create emergency health teams under WHO oversight (correct ref: Article 7.3)
- The WHO directs international rules, while Australia foots the bill and loses control
- WHO funding comes increasingly from private interests (only 25% from member states) – think Big Pharma, Gates Foundation, and GAVI
- These private funders also participate in negotiations. Whose interests are being served?
Global Pandemic Industrial Complex
This is not just about public health — it’s about creating a multi-billion dollar pandemic economy:
- WHO, the World Bank, and G20 propose US$31 billion annually for pandemic preparedness and prevention— that is 6-10 times more than current spending on TB or malaria
- Opaque ROI models inflate benefits and downplay costs (University of Leeds REPPARE Report)
- Spending is based on flawed assumptions and fear-driven modelling
- Opportunity costs: Will this shift resources from things that actually matter, like nutrition, chronic disease, and mental health?
Is the Pandemic Risk Real?
According to Dr David Bell (ex-WHO infectious disease specialist):
- Claims that pandemics are becoming more frequent are not supported by evidence
- Detection technology explains the apparent rise in ‘outbreaks’ – more you test the more you’ll find
- Models often inflate mortality rates using outdated data and flawed comparisons (e.g. pre-antibiotic era)
- Zoonotic spillover models exaggerate risk and ignore complex ecological factors
REPPARE & University of Leeds reports confirm:
The science doesn’t justify the panic.
What About Our COVID Response?
Has Australia actually learned from its own experience?
- No proper Cost-Benefit Analysis of lockdowns or mandates
- No National Interest Assessment of this Agreement has been made public
- No opportunity for Australians to evaluate what worked — and what didn’t
- A Royal Commission, recommended by the Senate in April 2024, has not been completed
So why are we signing up to sweeping reforms now?
What You Can Do
Make rejection of the WHO Pandemic Agreement a must!
- Write to Penny Wong telling her you don't agree with the Pandemic Agreement: you don't give your consent!
- Let her know: This is not what it seems
- Demand transparency, debate, and a completed Royal Commission before Australia signs anything
What Can You Expect?
- Sicker – by removing tailored, local health responses
- Poorer – by funding a bloated global bureaucracy
- Less Free – through permanent surveillance, censorship, and foreign supervision
